MT Solar designs and manufactures mounting structures for solar modules of all sizes. A DIY Vectis Cobot Welding Tool powered by a Universal Robots UR10e collaborative robot now handles a wide range of welds, enabling quick change-overs and optimized production. MT Solar overcame labor shortages and freed current staff from repetitive welding tasks while successfully handling a 300% surge in demand.
The challenge
MT Solar is a solar mounting equipment manufacturer headquartered in the picturesque community of Charlo, Montana. The company experiences a 300% jump in demand for its solar mount products every summer but has been unable to find skilled welding workers to handle the seasonal uptick. MT Solar owner and president Travis Jordan was in his office one day, “just scrambling” to deal with the labor shortage when one of MT Solar's welders handed him an article on welding robots. Jordan recalls: “He said 'I really think you should look into this, it would be a good solution for our team.' And I’m like, 'Well if you got one of the operators saying you need to look into robotics, you’ve got a reason you should be doing something here.'”
At that point, MT Solar’s lead times were two to three times what they were supposed to be. “It’s hard to find good, skilled people that are willing to come up here and work,” explains Jordan. His hiring woes reflect a national trend; the American Welding Society predicts a potential shortfall of 400,000 welders by 2025. MT Solar researched conventional welding robots but found them best suited to huge batches of the same item and lacking in flexibility.
Finding a flexible automation solution was crucial for MT Solar as the company makes many different types of mounting parts, often in high mix/low volume batches. Jordan explains: “Think of us as a 'Solar Ikea,' if you will—where all the pieces have to go out to the customer to be assembled in the field. If I don’t have all the other parts that go with it, I can’t ship anything.”
The cost of conventional automation was compounded by the hassle associated with programming and set up, adds Jordan. “At first it might look like a good idea to use traditional robots, but when you look at the time and resources to get them up and running and programming, it was not the route we wanted to take. Conventional robots aren't very flexible. They can’t handle a mixed bag. The envelope is too small. Or the fixturing can’t be manipulated properly, and the cost would have gone through the roof,” says Jordan, adding that the company preferred a solution that wouldn’t require safety guarding and that existing operators could handle.